Competitividad territorial en interés de los públicos
Resumen
Competitiveness refers to a territory successfully satisfying its aims and objectives. In both research and practice, aims and objectives are usually specified in terms of compatibility with market success – e.g. performance in international trade - and/or the success of hierarchies – e.g. performance of large corporations. We suggest a different paradigm, focused on compatibility with the interests of publics. Achieving this would require forums where people could freely inquire about the territory. They could then recognise their concerns about choice of the territory’s aims and objectives, and might identify when they share concerns, i.e. when they constitute a public. The forums would enable people to learn and experience, observe, discuss, share understanding and ideas, express their voice, and listen to others. Despite university governance and epistemic governance tending to crowd-out space for activities centred on publics, one way that researchers can help to create forums is by cooperating with citizens, community groups, policy-makers, and diaspora. Together, they might reframe the nature and purpose of territorial competitiveness, making it for the interests of publics.
Citas
Alasuutari, P., & Qadir, A. (2014). Epistemic governance: An approach to the politics of policy-making. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2014.887986
Branston, J.R., Cowling, K., & Sugden, R. (2006a). Corporate governance and the public interest. International Review of Applied Economics, 20(2), 189-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692170600581110
Branston, J.R., Rubini, L., Sugden, R., & Wilson, J.R. (2006b). The healthy development of economies: A strategic framework for competitiveness in the health industry. Review of Social Economy, 64(3), 301-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760600892717
Branston, J.R., Cowling, K.G., & Tomlinson, P.R. (2016). Addressing ‘strategic failure’: Widening the public interest in the UK financial and energy sectors. In Begley, J., Coffey, D., Donnelly, T., & Thornley, C. (Eds.), Global economic crisis and local economic development (pp. 198–222). Routledge.
Bristow, G. (2005). Everyone’s a ‘winner’: Problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness. Journal of Economic Geography, 5(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbh063
Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
Conyon, M., Ellman, M., Pitelis, C.N., Shipman, A., & Tomlinson, P.R. (2022). Big tech oligopolies, Keith Cowling, and monopoly capitalism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 46, 1205–1224. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beac062
Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems: An essay in political inquiry. Holt. Ohio University Press.
Edensor, T., & Sumartojo, S. (2018). Reconfiguring familiar worlds with light projection: The Gertrude Street Projection Festival, 2017. GeoHumanities, 4(1), 112-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2018.1446760
Gurri, M. (2018). The revolt of the public and the crisis of authority in the new millennium. Stripe Press.
Hirschman, A.O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Harvard University Press.
Marglin, S.A. (1974). What do bosses Do? The origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production. Review of Radical Political Economics, 6(2), 60–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/048661347400600206
Mooken, M., Sugden, R., & Valania, M. (2018). University impact on the development of industries in peripheral regions: Knowledge organization and the British Columbia wine industry. BC Studies: The British Columbian Quarterly, 198 (Summer), 125-152. https://doi.org/10.14288/bcs.v0i198.189278
Pesme, J.O., Sugden, R., Mooken, M., Valania, M., & Buschert, K. (2022). A reflective process to explore identity in an emerging wine territory: The example of British Columbia. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 34(1), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-07-2020-0034
Sacchetti, S. (2015). Inclusive and exclusive social preferences: A Deweyan framework to explain governance heterogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 473-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1971-0
Sacchetti, S., & Borzaga, C. (2021). The foundations of the “public organisation”: Governance failure and the problem of external effects. Journal of Management and Governance, 25, 731-758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09525-x
Sacchetti, S., & Sugden, R. (2009a). The organization of production and its publics: Mental proximity, markets and hierarchies. Review of Social Economy, 67(3), 289-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760802621906
Sacchetti, S., & Sugden, R. (2009b). Positioning order, disorder and creativity in research choices on local development. In Sacchetti S. & Sugden, R. (Eds.), Knowledge in the development of economies. Institutional choices under globalisation (pp. 269-288). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849802345
Sacchetti, F., Sacchetti, S., & Sugden, R. (2009). Creativity and socio-economic development: Space for the interests of publics. International Review of Applied Economics, 23(6), 653-672. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692170903239846
Sugden, R. (2019). Management education in a public university in the economic periphery: Reflections in action on UBC in Interior British Columbia. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 8(2), 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5947/jeod.2019.006
Sugden, R., & Pesme, J.O. (2016). Final report and recommendations of the task force on labelling and presentation. University of British Columbia Library. https://open.library.ubc.ca/soa/cIRcle/collections/facultyresearchandpublications/52383/items/1.0395428?o=0
Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. Macmillan.
Derechos de autor 2025 Deusto Business Alumni

Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.
Licencia:
Los trabajos publicados en esta revista desde 2021 se encuentran disponibles bajo la licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International - CC BY-NC 4.0. La actual política de acceso abierto de la revista no se aplica a los contenidos previos 2021.
Derechos de los autores/as:
Los autores y las autoras conservan los derechos de autor/a sobre sus trabajos publicados en el Boletín de Estudios Económicos y conceden a éste derechos no exclusivos para la explotación de los trabajos con fines de maquetación, publicación y difusión. Esta licencia permite al Boletín de Estudios Económicos distribuir, reproducir y difundir los trabajos en su plataforma y otros medios, siempre bajo las condiciones descritas en este aviso.
Derechos de los lectores/as:
Los lectores y las lectoras pueden leer, descargar, imprimir, buscar, compartir (copiar, redistribuir o enlazar textos completos), o adaptar (remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material) el contenido, siempre que:
- No se utilicen los materiales con fines comerciales.
- Se cite adecuadamente el trabajo original, incluyendo el nombre de la persona autora y la fuente.
- Se indique claramente cualquier modificación realizada al contenido original.
El uso comercial de los materiales está prohibido sin el permiso expreso de las personas autoras. Para mayor claridad, se considera uso comercial cualquier actividad que tenga como fin la obtención de beneficios económicos o que implique un intercambio comercial directo.
Condiciones de uso:
El uso del contenido no debe infringir los derechos de otras personas, ni debe ser utilizado de manera que pueda dañar la reputación del/la autor/a o del Boletín de Estudios Económicos.
Responsabilidad por el contenido:
Los/las autores/as son responsables del contenido de sus trabajos y el Boletín de Estudios Económicos no se hace responsable de las opiniones expresadas en los mismos.
Más información:
Política de Acceso Abierto, Licencia y Derechos de Autor/a