Sustainable territorial competitiveness within a post-growth paradigm
Abstract
This article addresses the imperative need to rethink the notion of competitiveness within the framework of territorial sustainability, highlighting the insufficiency of the current socio-economic model focused on growth to face contemporary socio-environmental challenges. It proposes an approach towards a post-growth model, where territorial competitiveness is redefined under the principles of social welfare, equity, and environmental sustainability, moving away from the traditional focus on economic growth. The main contribution lies in suggesting practical strategies for the transition towards sustainable territorial development, focused on promoting local circular economies, participatory governance, and the adoption of alternative indicators that prioritize well-being and sustainability over economic growth. This study is aimed at policy makers, researchers and academics interested in sustainable economics, as well as international organizations and NGOs, proposing a dialogue between economic theory and policy practice to foster more inclusive and sustainable economic development.
References
Aranguren, M.J., Farachala, P.C., Magro, E., Arancegui, M.N., Wilson, J.R., & Valdaliso, J.M. (2021). Estrategia territorial del País Vasco: Aprendizajes y retos para las grandes transiciones. Cuadernos Orkestra, 12. https://www.orkestra.deusto.es/es/investigacion/publicaciones/informes/cuadernos-orkestra/2278-210030-estrategia-territorial-pais-vasco
Alcalde, H., & Carnelli, M. (2019). Tendencias, oportunidades y retos, con perspectiva social. Cuadernos Orkestra, 48.
Barton, J., & Rogerson, M. (2017). The importance of greenspace for mental health. BJPsych International, 14(4), 79-81. https://doi.org/10.1192/S2056474000002051
Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Island Press.
Brundtland, G.H. (1987). Our common future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press.
Cheng, C.F.C., Yuan, Q., Hua, C., Xu, Y., Cantore, N., & Wang, K. (2023). Global inclusive and sustainable competitive industrial performance (ISCIP): An efficiency based spatio-temporal analysis for 139 countries. Applied Energy, 333, 120603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120603
Dasgupta, P. (2021). The economics of biodiversity: The Dasgupta review. HM Treasury.
Del Río Cortina, J., Calao Paternina, O., & Vidal-Durango, J.V. (2019). Evolución y desarrollo del concepto de competitividad y prospectiva. En Construyendo escenarios prospectivos para los desafíos del desarrollo competitivo del departamento de Sucre, Colombia (pp. 59-72).
Flores-Tapia, C.E., Pérez-González, M. del C., Maza-Ávila, F.J., & Flores-Cevallos, K.L. (2023). Public policy guidelines for a comprehensive, territorial and sustainable development to improve productivity and competitiveness: Case Tungurahua province–Ecuador. Heliyon, 9(5), e02613.
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M.P., & Hultink, E.J. (2017). The circular economy: A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
Harrahill, K., & Douglas, O. (2019). Framework development for ‘just transition’ in coal producing jurisdictions. Energy Policy, 134, 110990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110990
Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964
IPCC. (2023). Climate change 2023: Report. IPCC. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. Earthscan.
Kallis, G. (2011). In defense of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 70(5), 873-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007
Kallis, G., Kerschner, C., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2012). The economics of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 84, 172-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.017
Krugman, P. (1994a). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 28-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/20045917
Krugman, P. (1994b). The age of diminishing expectations. MIT Press.
Lombana, J., & Rozas Gutiérrez, S. (2009). Marco analítico de la competitividad: Fundamentos para el estudio de la competitividad regional. Pensamiento & Gestión, 26, 1-38.
McMahon, C., Subrahmanian, E., & Reich, Y. (2022). Lock-in, fixation and the extinction of technologies: A design-theoretic view of sustainable transitions. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 8(3), 415-430.
Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W.W. (2004). Limits to growth: The 30-year update. Chelsea Green Publishing.
O’Neill, D.W. (2020). Beyond green growth. Nature Sustainability, 3(4), 260-261.
Orkestra (2021). Constructing competitiveness for wellbeing, 2021. Basque Country Competitiveness Report. Deusto Publications.
Orkestra (2023). Transición hacia una competitividad medioambientalmente sostenible, 2023. Basque Country Competitiveness Report. Deusto Publications.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J.H. (2019). Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environment Bureau (EEB).
Parrique, T., Raworth, K., & Liegey, V. (2023). A post-growth Europe critical to survive and thrive. European Youth Forum.
Porter, M.E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press.
Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.
Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Lucht, W., Bendtsen, J., Cornell, S.E., Donges, J.F., ... & Rockström, J. (2023). Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances, 9(37), eadh2458. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin III, F.S., Lambin, E., ... & Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232
Rydin, Y. (2010). Governing for sustainable urban development. Earthscan.
Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals and COVID-19. Sustainable Development Report 2020. Cambridge University Press.
Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. Blond & Briggs.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Shuman, M. (2007). The small-mart revolution: How local businesses are beating the global competition. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Stephenson, S.D., & Allwood, J.M. (2023). Technology to the rescue? Techno-scientific practices in the United Kingdom Net Zero Strategy and their role in locking in high energy decarbonisation pathways. Energy Research and Social Science, 106, 103314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103314
Stiglitz, J.E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.P. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives: Why GDP doesn’t add up. The New Press.
Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. Guilford Press.
Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kaźmierczak, A., Niemelä, J., & James, P. (2007). Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81(3), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
United Nations. (2015). The Paris Agreement.
Vogel, J., & Hickel, J. (2023). Is green growth happening? An empirical analysis of achieved versus Paris-compliant CO2–GDP decoupling in high-income countries. The Lancet Planetary Health, 7(9), e759–e769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00174-2
World Economic Forum. (2019). Global Competitiveness Report 2019.
Young, I.M. (2005). Responsabilidad y justicia global: Un modelo de conexión social. Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez, 39, 689-726.
Copyright (c) 2025 Deusto Business Alumni

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License:
Works published in this journal are available since 2021 under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license - CC BY-NC 4.0. Content prior to 2021 is not covered by the journal's current Open Access policy.
Authors' Rights:
Authors retain copyright over their work published in the Bulletin of Economic Studies and grant the Bulletin of Economic Studies non-exclusive rights to exploit the work for layout, publication, and dissemination purposes. This license allows the Bulletin of Economic Studies to distribute, reproduce, and disseminate the work on its platform and through other media, subject to the conditions outlined in this notice.
Readers' Rights:
Readers may read, download, print, search, share (copy, redistribute, or link to full text), or adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the content, provided that:
- The materials are not used for commercial purposes.
- The original work is properly cited, including the name of the author and the source.
- Any modifications made to the original content are clearly indicated.
Commercial use of the materials is prohibited without the express permission of the authors. For clarity, commercial use is defined as any activity intended for financial gain or involving direct commercial exchange.
Conditions of Use:
The use of content must not infringe the rights of others or be used in a way that could damage the reputation of the author or the Bulletin of Economic Studies.
Responsibility for Content:
Authors are responsible for the content of their papers and the Bulletin of Economic Studies is not responsible for the opinions therein expressed.
More Information:
Open Access, Licensing, and Copyright Policy