The mediating role of knowledge intensive business services in innovation and sales: evidence from Peruvian companies
Abstract
This study presents previously published results from a leading disciplinary journal, analyzing how Knowledge-Intensive Business Services—which provide specialized expertise—facilitate the successful implementation of both digital and traditional innovations in companies. Digital innovation poses unique implementation challenges due to its technological complexity and specialized training needs, while many innovations fail to generate an immediate commercial impact. Through a quantitative analysis of 959 Peruvian companies, it was found that internally developed innovations tend to focus on incremental improvements without creating significant short-term value. However, KIBS serve as crucial mediators, enabling effective implementation and generating a positive impact on immediate sales. Manufacturing companies favor traditional innovations, while service firms adopt more digital innovations. These findings suggest that outsourcing specialized knowledge is fundamental for the early commercial success of innovations.
References
Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., Moedas, C. (2018). Open innovation: research, practices, and policies. California Management Review, 60(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617745086
Ciriaci, D., Montresor, S., & Palma, D. (2015). Do KIBS make manufacturing more innovative? An empirical investigation of four European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 95, 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.008
Crespi, G., Katz, J., & Olivari, J. (2018). Innovation, natural resource-based activities and growth in emerging economies: the formation and role of knowledge-intensive service firms. Innovation and Development, 8(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2017.1377387
ECLAC (2022). Innovation for development: the key to a transformative recovery in Latin America and the Caribbean. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago, Chile.
Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes, C. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639
Heredia-Pérez, J. A., Geldes, C., Kunc, M. H., & Flores, A. (2019). New approach to the innovation process in emerging economies: The manufacturing sector case in Chile and Peru. Technovation, 79, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.012
Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35, 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
Kendall, W. A., Norman, P. M., Hatfield, D. E., & Cardinal, L. B. (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance. Journal of Production Innovation Management, 27(5), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00747.x
Kumar, R. R., Stauvermann, P. J., & Samitas, A. (2016). The effects of ICT on output per worker: a study of the Chinese economy. Telecommunications Policy, 40(2-3), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.06.004
Liu, Y., Dong, J., Mei, L., & Shen, R. (2023). Digital innovation and performance of manufacturing firms: an affordance perspective. Technovation, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102458
López, N., Montes, J., & Vázquez, C. (2007). Cómo gestionar la innovación en las PYMES. La Coruña: Netbiblo.
Miles, I. (2005). Knowledge intensive business services: prospects and policies. Foresight, 7(6), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680510630939
Miles I. (2012). KIBS and Knowledge Dynamics in Client-Supplier Interaction. in. di Maria, E. (Ed): Exploring Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: Knowledge Management Strategies, (pp. 13–34). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mothe, C., & Nguyen, T. (2010). The link between non-technological innovations and technological innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061011060148
PRODUCE (2020). Anuario Estadístico Industrial, Mipyme y Comercio Interno 2019. Ministerio de la Producción, Lima, pp. 8–13.
PRODUCE & INEI (2019). Encuesta Nacional de Empresas 2019. Ministerio de la Producción.
Rossi, F., Caloffi, A., Colovic, A., & Russo, M. (2022). New business models for public innovation intermediaries supporting emerging innovation systems: the case of the Internet of Things. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121357
Seclen-Luna, J. P., Alvarez-Salazar, J., Cancino, C., Schmitt, V. G. H. (2024). The effects of innovations on Peruvian company’s sales: the mediating role of KIBS. Technovation, 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102877
Seclen-Luna, J. P., & Barrutia-Güenaga, J. (2019). Gestión de la Innovación Empresarial: Conceptos, Modelos y Sistemas. Fondo Editorial Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
Seclen-Luna, J. P., Moya-Fernández, P., Barrutia, J., Ferruci, L. (2022). Innovation in micro firm builders of machine tool? Effects of T-KIBS on technological and nontechnological innovations. Review of Business Management, 24, 144–158. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v24i1.4163
Soetano, D., & Demir, R. (2023). The impact of networking with knowledge-intensive professional service firms on speed to market and product innovativeness. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 71, 5182-5196. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3239374
Yoo, Y., Boland, R., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organizational Science, 23(5), 1398–1408. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0771
Copyright (c) 2026 Deusto Business Alumni

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License:
Works published in this journal are available since 2021 under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license - CC BY-NC 4.0. Content prior to 2021 is not covered by the journal's current Open Access policy.
Authors' Rights:
Authors retain copyright over their work published in the Bulletin of Economic Studies and grant the Bulletin of Economic Studies non-exclusive rights to exploit the work for layout, publication, and dissemination purposes. This license allows the Bulletin of Economic Studies to distribute, reproduce, and disseminate the work on its platform and through other media, subject to the conditions outlined in this notice.
Readers' Rights:
Readers may read, download, print, search, share (copy, redistribute, or link to full text), or adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the content, provided that:
- The materials are not used for commercial purposes.
- The original work is properly cited, including the name of the author and the source.
- Any modifications made to the original content are clearly indicated.
Commercial use of the materials is prohibited without the express permission of the authors. For clarity, commercial use is defined as any activity intended for financial gain or involving direct commercial exchange.
Conditions of Use:
The use of content must not infringe the rights of others or be used in a way that could damage the reputation of the author or the Bulletin of Economic Studies.
Responsibility for Content:
Authors are responsible for the content of their papers and the Bulletin of Economic Studies is not responsible for the opinions therein expressed.
More Information:
Open Access, Licensing, and Copyright Policy
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)



