Novel mechanisms of corporate governance? Activism and the influence of stakeholders over financial information
Abstract
Activism has recently emerged as a potential new corporate governance mechanism for companies. While the influence of stakeholders as interested third parties, and particularly, of institutional investors, is still limited in Europe, their growing role in other countries is suggestive of great future importance. This paper provides a panoramic review of academic literature on this recent phenomenon, focusing on how activism influences the economic and financial information prepared by companies. We conclude by providing several reflections on possible implications for practitioners and regulators.
Received: 16 September 2022
Accepted: 26 September 2022
References
Baloria, V. P., & Heese, J. (2018). The effects of media slant on firm behavior. Journal of Financial Economics, 129(1), 184-202.
Barua, A., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (2017). Shareholder votes on auditor ratification and subsequent auditor dismissals. Accounting Horizons, 31(1), 129– 139.
Beaver, W. H., McNichols, M. F., & Wang, Z. Z. (2020). Increased market response to earnings announcements in the 21st century: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 69(1), 101-244.
Bischof, J., Daske, H., & Sextroh, C. J. (2020). Why do politicians intervene in accounting regulation? The role of ideology and special interests. Journal of Accounting Research, 58 (3), 589-642.
Black, B. S. (1990). Shareholder passivity reexamined. Michigan Law Review, 89,(3), 520-608.
Bozanic, Z., Hoopes, J. L., Thornock, J. R. & Williams, B. (2017). IRS attention. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(1), 79-114.
Bushee, B.J., & Miller, G.S. (2012). Investor relations, firm visibility, and investor following. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 867-897.
Cascino, S., Correia, M., & Tamayo, A. (2020). Does consumer protection enhance disclosure credibility in reward crowdfunding? Journal of Accounting Research, 57(5), 1247-1302.
Cohen, L., Malloy, C., & Nguyen, Q. (2020). Lazy prices. The Journal of Finance. 75(3), 1371-1415.
Dai, L., Parwada, J. T., & Zhang, B. (2015). The governance effect of the media’s role: Evidence from insider trading. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 331-366.
Dimson, E., Karakas, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active ownership. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3325-3368.
Drake, M. S., Guest, N. M., & Twedt, B. J. (2014). The media and mispricing: The role of the business press in the pricing of accounting information. The Accounting Review, 89(5), 1673-1701.
Drake, M.S., Hales, J., & Rees, L. (2019). Disclosure overload? A professional user perspective on the usefulness of general-purpose financial statements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(4), 1935-1965.
Dyck, A., Volchkova, N., & Zingales, L. (2008). The corporate governance role of the media: Evidence from Russia. The Journal of Finance, 63(3), 1093-1135.
Dyreng, S. D., Hoopes, J. L., & Wilde, J. H. (2016). Public pressure and corporate tax behavior. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 147-186.
Ferri, F. & Sandino, T. (2009). The impact of shareholder activism on financial reporting and compensation: The case of employee stock options expensing. The Accounting Review, 84, 433-466.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (2018). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 8: Chapter 8, Notes to Financial Statements. Norwalk, CT: FASB Foundation.
García Osma, B., & Grande-Herrera, C. (2021). The role of users’ engagement in shaping financial reporting: should activists target accounting more? Accounting and Business Research, 51(5), 511-544.
Giner, B., & Mora, A. (2021). Political interference in private entities’ financial reporting and the public interest: Evidence from the Spanish financial crisis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(7), 1581-1607.
Grant, S. M. (2020). How does using a mobile device change investors’ reaction to firm disclosures? Journal of Accounting Research, 58(3), 741-775.
Green, T. C., Jame, R., Markov, S., & Subasi, M. (2014). Broker-hosted investor conferences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(1), 142-166.
Grewal, J., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Shareholder activism on sustainability issues. Harvard Business School Working Paper. Disponible online en: https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/27864360, (consultado Sep-2022).
Grossman, S., & Hart, O. (1980). Takeover bids, the free rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. Bell Journal of Economics, 11(1), 42-64.
Guo, F., Lin, C., Masli, A., & Wilkins, M. S. (2021). Auditor responses to shareholder activism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(1), 63-95.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Huang, K., Li, M., & Markov, S. (2020). What do employees know? Evidence from a social media platform. The Accounting Review, 95(2), 199-226.
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2018). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. London, U.K.: IFRS Foundation.
Klein, A., & Zur, E. (2009). Entrepreneurial shareholder activism: Hedge funds and other private investors. The Journal of Finance, 64(1), 187-229.
Krishnan, J., & Ye, Z. (2005). Why some companies seek shareholder ratification on auditor selection. Accounting Horizons, 19(4), 237-254.
Lev, B., & Rajgopal, S. (2016). Why FASB should hit pause. Accounting Today. Disponible en: https://www.accountingtoday.com/news/why-fasb-should-hit-pause, (consultado Sep-2022).
McCahery, J. A., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2016). Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. The Journal of Finance, 71(6), 2905-2932.
Pelger, C., & Spieβ, N. (2017). On the IASB’s construction of legitimacy – the case of the agenda consultation project. Accounting and Business Research, 47(1), 64-90.
Piotroski, J. D., & Roulstone, B. T. (2004). The influence of analysts, institutional investors, and insiders on the incorporation of market, industry and firm-specific information into stock prices. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 1119-1151.
Power, M. (2010). Fair value accounting, financial economics and the transformation of reliability. Accounting and Business Research, 40(3), 197-210.
Renneboog, L., & Szilagyi, P. G. (2011). The role of shareholder proposals in corporate governance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(1), 167-188.
Sainty, B. J., Taylor, G. K., & Williams, D. D. (2002). Investor dissatisfaction toward auditors. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 17(2), 111–136.
Securities and Exchange Commission. (2020). General Electric agrees to pay $200 million penalty for disclosure violations. Press Release 2020-312. Washington D.C, Diciembre 9. Disponible online: https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2020-312 (consultado Sep-2022).
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461-468.
Solomon, D., & Soltes, E. (2015). What are we meeting for? the consequences of private meetings with investors. Journal of Law and Economics, 58(2), 325-354.
Thomas, R. S., & Cotter, J. F. (2007). Shareholder proposals in the new millennium: Shareholder support, board response and market reaction. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(2-3), 368-391.
Williams, P., & Ravenscroft, S. (2015). Rethinking decision usefulness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(2), 763-788.
Copyright (c) 2023 Deusto Business Alumni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When authors submit a paper for reviewing and publishing, they retain their copyright, but they automatically agree to grant non-exclusive publishing rights to the BULLETIN OF ECONOMIC STUDIES and agree that the paper will be published under a Creative Commons licence CC BY 4.0, if the paper is accepted for publication. Authors are encouraged to read their rights carefully. We believe this approach ensures a fair arrangement for both parties. The licence granted allows the Journal to edit and typeset the paper, which will be included in a forthcoming issue and distributed in any online and offline medium that the journal deems necessary in order to promote the paper, the authors, and the Journal. This paragraph is included in the Guidelines for Authors.
For more information about the Creative Commons Licence, please visit: https://creativecommons.org.