¿Nuevas formas de gobierno empresarial? Activismo e influencia de terceras partes interesadas en la información económico-financiera
Resumen
El activismo emerge en fechas recientes como un nuevo potencial mecanismo de gobierno corporativo de las empresas. Si bien la influencia de terceras partes interesadas y fundamentalmente, de los inversores institucionales, es aún limitada en Europa, su creciente rol en otros países sugiere la posibilidad de una gran importancia futura. En este trabajo se ofrece una panorámica de la evidencia académica sobre este fenómeno reciente, centrándonos en cómo el activismo influye en la información económico-financiera preparada por las empresas. Concluimos el trabajo con algunas reflexiones sobre posibles implicaciones para profesionales y reguladores.
Recibido: 16 septiembre 2022
Aceptado: 26 septiembre 2022
Citas
Baloria, V. P., & Heese, J. (2018). The effects of media slant on firm behavior. Journal of Financial Economics, 129(1), 184-202.
Barua, A., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (2017). Shareholder votes on auditor ratification and subsequent auditor dismissals. Accounting Horizons, 31(1), 129– 139.
Beaver, W. H., McNichols, M. F., & Wang, Z. Z. (2020). Increased market response to earnings announcements in the 21st century: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 69(1), 101-244.
Bischof, J., Daske, H., & Sextroh, C. J. (2020). Why do politicians intervene in accounting regulation? The role of ideology and special interests. Journal of Accounting Research, 58 (3), 589-642.
Black, B. S. (1990). Shareholder passivity reexamined. Michigan Law Review, 89,(3), 520-608.
Bozanic, Z., Hoopes, J. L., Thornock, J. R. & Williams, B. (2017). IRS attention. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(1), 79-114.
Bushee, B.J., & Miller, G.S. (2012). Investor relations, firm visibility, and investor following. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 867-897.
Cascino, S., Correia, M., & Tamayo, A. (2020). Does consumer protection enhance disclosure credibility in reward crowdfunding? Journal of Accounting Research, 57(5), 1247-1302.
Cohen, L., Malloy, C., & Nguyen, Q. (2020). Lazy prices. The Journal of Finance. 75(3), 1371-1415.
Dai, L., Parwada, J. T., & Zhang, B. (2015). The governance effect of the media’s role: Evidence from insider trading. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 331-366.
Dimson, E., Karakas, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active ownership. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3325-3368.
Drake, M. S., Guest, N. M., & Twedt, B. J. (2014). The media and mispricing: The role of the business press in the pricing of accounting information. The Accounting Review, 89(5), 1673-1701.
Drake, M.S., Hales, J., & Rees, L. (2019). Disclosure overload? A professional user perspective on the usefulness of general-purpose financial statements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(4), 1935-1965.
Dyck, A., Volchkova, N., & Zingales, L. (2008). The corporate governance role of the media: Evidence from Russia. The Journal of Finance, 63(3), 1093-1135.
Dyreng, S. D., Hoopes, J. L., & Wilde, J. H. (2016). Public pressure and corporate tax behavior. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 147-186.
Ferri, F. & Sandino, T. (2009). The impact of shareholder activism on financial reporting and compensation: The case of employee stock options expensing. The Accounting Review, 84, 433-466.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (2018). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 8: Chapter 8, Notes to Financial Statements. Norwalk, CT: FASB Foundation.
García Osma, B., & Grande-Herrera, C. (2021). The role of users’ engagement in shaping financial reporting: should activists target accounting more? Accounting and Business Research, 51(5), 511-544.
Giner, B., & Mora, A. (2021). Political interference in private entities’ financial reporting and the public interest: Evidence from the Spanish financial crisis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(7), 1581-1607.
Grant, S. M. (2020). How does using a mobile device change investors’ reaction to firm disclosures? Journal of Accounting Research, 58(3), 741-775.
Green, T. C., Jame, R., Markov, S., & Subasi, M. (2014). Broker-hosted investor conferences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(1), 142-166.
Grewal, J., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Shareholder activism on sustainability issues. Harvard Business School Working Paper. Disponible online en: https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/27864360, (consultado Sep-2022).
Grossman, S., & Hart, O. (1980). Takeover bids, the free rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. Bell Journal of Economics, 11(1), 42-64.
Guo, F., Lin, C., Masli, A., & Wilkins, M. S. (2021). Auditor responses to shareholder activism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(1), 63-95.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Huang, K., Li, M., & Markov, S. (2020). What do employees know? Evidence from a social media platform. The Accounting Review, 95(2), 199-226.
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2018). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. London, U.K.: IFRS Foundation.
Klein, A., & Zur, E. (2009). Entrepreneurial shareholder activism: Hedge funds and other private investors. The Journal of Finance, 64(1), 187-229.
Krishnan, J., & Ye, Z. (2005). Why some companies seek shareholder ratification on auditor selection. Accounting Horizons, 19(4), 237-254.
Lev, B., & Rajgopal, S. (2016). Why FASB should hit pause. Accounting Today. Disponible en: https://www.accountingtoday.com/news/why-fasb-should-hit-pause, (consultado Sep-2022).
McCahery, J. A., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2016). Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. The Journal of Finance, 71(6), 2905-2932.
Pelger, C., & Spieβ, N. (2017). On the IASB’s construction of legitimacy – the case of the agenda consultation project. Accounting and Business Research, 47(1), 64-90.
Piotroski, J. D., & Roulstone, B. T. (2004). The influence of analysts, institutional investors, and insiders on the incorporation of market, industry and firm-specific information into stock prices. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 1119-1151.
Power, M. (2010). Fair value accounting, financial economics and the transformation of reliability. Accounting and Business Research, 40(3), 197-210.
Renneboog, L., & Szilagyi, P. G. (2011). The role of shareholder proposals in corporate governance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(1), 167-188.
Sainty, B. J., Taylor, G. K., & Williams, D. D. (2002). Investor dissatisfaction toward auditors. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 17(2), 111–136.
Securities and Exchange Commission. (2020). General Electric agrees to pay $200 million penalty for disclosure violations. Press Release 2020-312. Washington D.C, Diciembre 9. Disponible online: https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2020-312 (consultado Sep-2022).
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461-468.
Solomon, D., & Soltes, E. (2015). What are we meeting for? the consequences of private meetings with investors. Journal of Law and Economics, 58(2), 325-354.
Thomas, R. S., & Cotter, J. F. (2007). Shareholder proposals in the new millennium: Shareholder support, board response and market reaction. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(2-3), 368-391.
Williams, P., & Ravenscroft, S. (2015). Rethinking decision usefulness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(2), 763-788.
Derechos de autor 2023 Deusto Business Alumni
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0.
Cuando los autores envían un artículo para su revisión y publicación, conservan sus derechos de autor, pero aceptan automáticamente conceder los derechos de publicación no exclusivos al BOLETÍN DE ESTUDIOS ECONÓMICOS y aceptan que el artículo se publique bajo una licencia Creative Commons CC BY 4.0, si el artículo es aceptado para su publicación. Se recomienda a los autores que lean atentamente sus derechos. Creemos que este enfoque garantiza un acuerdo justo para ambas partes. La licencia concedida permite a la revista editar y maquetar el artículo, que se incluirá en un próximo número y se distribuirá en cualquier medio online y offline que la revista considere necesario para promocionar el artículo, los autores y la revista. Este párrafo se incluye en las Directrices para los autores.
Para más información sobre la licencia Creative Commons, visite: https://creativecommons.org.